This form is to capture information on the habitat models created by the Southwest Regional Gap Analysis Project.
Please provide your name, email address, states in which review is for and your knowledge of the species.
[dd-MMM-yyyy]









Species - Please provide species common name and associated ITIS code




OR
AND
ITIS number is a 6-digit code and is required.
Please use the following scale to answer the following questions.
NA - Not Applicable
5 - Very Confident
4 - Confident
3 - Sufficient
2 - Questionable
1 - Highly Questionable
Model
What level of confidence to you have with the model (the spatial depiction)?





Report
What level of confidence do you have regarding the overall textual model? Please remember the assumptions involved in our modeling approach.







Range
What level of confidence do you have regarding the range extent of the species?







Based on your knowledge of the species, what level of confidence do you have regarding the range coding?







If you would like to change the range of the species, please print out the range map and make needed corrections. Then send the map to Ken Boykin.

Land Cover
If land cover was used in the model, does this adequately reflect the association of the species with land cover?







If there are additional land cover types that the species is associated with or there are land cover types that are not associated with the species please describe below.
Elevation
If elevation was used in the model, does this adequately reflect the association of the species with elevation?








Aspect
If aspect was used in the model, does this adequately reflect the association of the species with aspect?








Slope
If slope was used in the model, does this adequately reflect the association of the species with slope?








Hydrology
If hydrology was used in the model, does this adequately reflect the association of the species with hydrology?








Landform
If landform was used in the model, does landform adequately reflect the association of the species with landform?






Soils
If soil was used in the model, does this adequately reflect the association of the species with soil?








Patch Size
If patch size was used in the model, does this adequately reflect the association of the species with patch size?








Mountain Ranges
If mountains were used in the model, does this adequately reflect the association of the species with mountains?








Model Attributes
Are there any attributes that should not be used to model this species as described above or are there any attributes that should be included within the model? Please, describe below.
Other Attributes
Please describe other attributes that would be important for modeling. These databases should be readily available. Please indicate source and contacts for data.
References
Please list any references that would be useful in modifying the model?
Comments
Your comments are critical to help us create the best models. Please describe in detail your views of the above model. Feel free to email Ken Boykin regarding model specifics or the process in general.Your comments are critical to help us create the best models.
Thank you for providing us information.
View Error Details
 
Powered by